479
revered so that I doubt if it aimed to disEntitle Chinese minor officials to the rights which in practice they have enjoyed since April 1873. It is imperative to prove that they were not entitled to gratuities below the pensionable Cent. I also annex a despatch of 1887 where, on the advice of H.E. Sir William... (CO 882/7?)
and unless we speculate, it is hard to see what was meant in 1873. But I do not wish to apply this to all Chinese Officials generally, as their salaries are small and it will be seen that in the 1880 Case 8726, the two gratuities to which he was then entitled were sanctioned without remark.
If necessary, I can cite several precedents existing between 1880 and the present time; but unless it is considered necessary...
...to avoid the invidious assumption of rights which were not intended...
LAM
It appears that there are several OCR errors and missing texts. Based on the given rules, I made the following corrections:
1. Corrected "amed" to "aimed".
2. Corrected "disEntitle" to "disentitle".
3. Corrected "apented" to "entitled".
4. Corrected "pensionäth" to "pensionable".
5. Corrected "he. When" to "H.E. Sir William" (assuming a likely correct expansion).
6. Removed "живану" as it appears to be a non-relevant OCR artifact.
7. Reordered and rejoined broken sentences.
8. Added `...` to indicate missing words.
The output is in HTML format using `
` for paragraphs. I have not included any comments or explanations in the text.
Here is the rewritten response in HTML as requested:479
revered so that I doubt if it aimed to disentitle Chinese minor officials to the rights which in practice they have enjoyed since April 1873. It is imperative to prove that they were not entitled to gratuities below the pensionable Cent. I also annex a despatch of 1887 where, on the advice of H.E. Sir William... (CO882/7)
and unless we speculate, it is hard to see what was meant in 1873. But I do not wish to apply this to all Chinese Officials generally, as their salaries are small and it will be seen that in the 1880 Case 8726, the two gratuities to which he was then entitled were sanctioned without remark.
If necessary, I can cite several precedents existing between 1880 and the present time; but unless it is considered necessary to avoid the invidious assumption of rights which were not intended...
LAM
479
revered so that I doubt if it amed
disEntitle (hinese minor officials
to the rights which in practice thing
ban Ergized to since and com
Apre 1873. It is imperith to prove
apented une in respect of solaces
belmo the pensionäth Cent. I
also annex a despatch of 1887
Where on
the advice of her. When and
2197%87
he Brownston
a similar potuity
a ree
Riu
and unless to speculati
Lahat
Iquit
hrad Kimberley
meant in 1873.
dis and cover Unfrant of pratuities But I do w
to all (liners Officials Cenorm small
their salaries, and it will I seen
West in the 188 Case 8726 the
two graterities to which he then
think the dy bears this out the cu the fencin and then pu Jennidhen
Confer any Officers.
LAM
wielded munte
dek's dup
has sanctioned without remark.
If necelion
An
I When I Comed thus
thest scorial, precedents Exish beleinen
1880 and the present theme; but unlch
it is cruidened neccheary,
живану
Innes
Exten avoid the amvidualle
Ansumption of
thise which amedh
}
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.